I wanted in on the Reading Rage fun. I mean, I have a lot of rage. Especially when it comes to reading. I have a lot of love, too, don’t get me wrong, but I’m also totally wrathy.
Today, let’s talk about young adult fantasy novels. I’ll admit it, I’m hooked on them. I know, I’m an adult, and as such, I should probably be reading things with more style and substance. However, I can’t resist a good young adult fantasy novel. Harry Potter? Yes, please. The Hunger Games? More of that. The His Dark Materials trilogy? Swoon. Kristen Cashore’s Graceling series? Delicious.
But for every good young adult fantasy, there are swarms – SWARMS! – of horrible books, just waiting for me to stumble upon them and, after reading a few chapters (or, because I am stubborn about finishing everything that’s on my plate, the entire novel) run away cursing and screaming. Yes, I’m looking at you, Maggie Stiefvater, with your utterly craptastic Wolves of Mercy Falls series. Ugh.
Here are some of the ways that you, too, can ruin your young adult fantasy novel and ensure that I will mentally draw and quarter you. And perhaps flay. Yes, also perhaps flaying will occur.
Have a weak female main character.
I’m not saying you have to have a female main character (although I’m predisposed to like you more if you do, sorry, that’s just me.) I’m just saying, if you do, please, for the love of all that’s holy, show me WHY she’s the main character. If she’s constantly needing to be rescued by a strapping young teen in a tight white teeshirt, she doesn’t deserve to be the main character. HE does. I mean, is she only your main character so you can show how weak she is? You want an example. Oh, you don’t think I can? I’ll show YOU. I WILL GIVE YOU ONE. Hush, Hush by Becca Fitzpatrick. Not the worst YA fantasy book I’ve ever read. But the main character kept putting herself in these ridiculously stupid situations. “Oh! Patch (yes, yes, the romantic lead’s name is Patch, not anyone’s finest hour) told me NOT to go to the bad part of town and enter the pool hall. I MUST DO SO NOW. Oh! No! Patch! People are TRYING TO KILL ME!” It was disconcerting. I don’t want to read an entire book about some weakling who can’t save her own day – or, almost worse, can’t get out of her own way. It’s fine to show me someone’s weaknesses, but if they’re utterly idiotic, I’m tuning out.
Have a love triangle where one of the participants clearly doesn’t stand a chance.

Love this, but Duckie didn't stand a chance, because he was obviously gay. OH STOP IT. I love him too. But he WAS.
The best love triangles are the ones in which you can see WHY the person who’s having to make the choice is having a hard time deciding between the two contenders. Let’s take The Hunger Games, for example. Katniss had to choose between Peeta and Gale. You could see why she was having a hard time choosing: she’d grown up with Gale, he was the typical “male romantic lead,” and she’d always had feelings for him; Peeta, on the other hand, was new to the equation, but she found herself liking him, getting to know him, and he proved himself a strong champion. Therefore, since both characters had good and bad qualities, you actually had a stake, as a reader, in which she chose, and it made for interesting reading. Reading a book in which the love triangle is between a young man who is just perfect in every way and a young man who is bitter, abusive, and unintelligent is not interesting, because you know where it’s going. I mean, you do, right? I suppose the author might surprise you and have his character choose the lesser of the two choices, but then you have the ramifications of that choice, and that’s equally bad. Just give me two real characters for him or her to choose from, with real pros and cons, please. Not one real character and a shady weirdo who skulks amongst garbage cans or some such nonsense.
Have the teenagers act like adults.
Have you ever been around teenagers? Or, barring that, how about this. Have you ever BEEN a teenager? Probably you have. I mean, I don’t know your life, maybe you’re a robot. Teenagers don’t make decisions the same way adults do. Teenagers don’t talk the way adults do. Teenagers don’t ACT the way adults do. (There’s a lot of emo-moping and tortured poetry and heaving sighs, if I remember my own teenage years correctly.) Sure, there are situations where teenagers, due to societal pressure or family breakdown or what-have-you, have had to mature more quickly, but even in those situations, the teenager in the teenager still breaks through now and then. Hormones are the ruling factor in a teenager. Bad young adult fantasy writers tend to forget this and write as if their characters are just smaller adults without diplomas or jobs. In the above-mentioned (shudder, SO BAD) Stiefvater series, one of the teenagers realizes she has this obscure medical knowledge – that I’d argue even an ADULT DOCTOR wouldn’t have – that can save the day. ARE YOU KIDDING ME. No. Just, no.
Tread ground that’s been trod before.
I know, this is a tough one, because, when you think about it, ALL ground has been trod before. We’ve got books about witches, werewolves, fairies, vampires, dystopian futures, on and on and on. I’m not saying you can’t use these plot points – you are, after all, writing young adult fantasy fiction, so you’re probably going to want to throw something along these lines in there – but do it differently than it’s been done before. How are your vampires different than the norm? How do your fairies differ from the stories? We already have a Harry Potter – do we need another book about witches at school? If you think we do, how will yours be different enough to matter? And NO. I am also not saying you need to throw stupidity in. Major, major rule: it is never a good time for stupidity just for stupidity’s sake, just to stand out from the crowd. Don’t make your vampires sparkle, please? Or make it so your vampires can breed with humans? I mean, we have to have a sense of DECORUM, here, people. Unless you want to be laughed out of your writer’s club, or wherever you go for feedback and coffee cake. See, writers, you’re people. And, as people, as much as it pains me to say it, we’re all special snowflakes, who were all molded and shaped by our individual experiences in life. Take what made you, and put that on the page. Your particular set of tools is different than everyone else’s. Use them to your full advantage.
Talk down to your readers.
Yes, teenagers aren’t, as mentioned above, adults. However! Teenagers are savvy readers, especially in this day and age. They KNOW when they’re being patronized. They even smell the slightest hint of that, and they’re gone. And they talk, authors. Oh, do they talk. This can work in your favor – word of mouth from rabid teens has done wonders, I mean, look at Twilight! – but it can also hurt you if you decided to talk down to your readers and they caught wind of it. They’re going to SAVAGE you, both online and in real-life conversations. And teenagers have, despite what you’ve heard, long memories. Your next book? Forget it. They’ll remember that you thought they were stupid in your last book and they’ll stay far away from you. Not to mention that there are many adults, such as myself, who are reading your books, and, while we’re a little more forgiving, considering we’re reading young adult literature to begin with, we really don’t want to read something patronizing or childish. Things to avoid: rants in the middle of your text about social issues (the worst, and most egregious, is when you have one of your characters start spouting off how they’re “saving themselves for marriage” – NO NO NO. Listen, sure, there are teenagers who are doing this, and good for them, if that’s their thing. But I bet they’re not GOING AROUND DOUCHING IT UP AND PREACHING ABOUT IT. Not unless they want to be pantsed and made fun of on Facebook for the world to see or something. Gah), using elementary vocabulary (if we don’t show teenagers advanced language, how will they learn it? If they don’t know the word, they’ll glean what they need from context, or look it up, I guarantee you that), and assuming teenagers are too stupid to notice plot holes or cardboard characters (nope, this is a media-savvy generation, they’re all over that, and they’ll call you on it, too – they may not know what such things are called, but they’ll know something’s wrong.)
What about you, Booksluttians? Any young adult fantasy fans want to chime in? What do you hate when reading a young adult fantasy novel? What did I miss? And, perhaps most importantly, what good young adult fantasy novels should I be reading that I haven’t read yet?





is bella swan the worst and weakest female lead ever? i think so.
One of them, yes. I didn’t want to concentrate TOO much on Twilight, because the Twi-hate is everywhere, but I’m in complete agreement with it. I quake to think that girls are looking up to Bella as a role model, I truly do. There are so many more deserving literary YA heroines. Almost all, actually. Including furniture, cats, and abandoned houses. All of those things? More deserving of hero-worship than Bella Swan.
I love your rage. I often avoid YA not because I don’t like YA but because the chances of picking up really terrible YA fiction seems to be high. However, I read Stiefvater’s The Scorpio Races and loved it. The main character is a feisty girl who acts more like an adult (she is an orphan) but she also has all the insecurities a teen would likely have. Perhaps she learned from her Mercy Falls series.
The story is always better when you can think back to the main character and say “I know someone like that” or even better: “I could be friends with someone like that”.
I’m going to start making a list of everyone’s awesome recommendations. Did you read any of Stiefvater’s Mercy Falls series? I can’t even…ugh. I read the first book, then the second because I thought, “IT HAS TO GET BETTER DAMMIT.” It got worse. I stopped.
Agreed – Lyra Silvertongue, Hermione Granger – heroines I want to hang out with in real life (well, a younger me would. Me now would probably be too daunted by them, even though they’re adolescents. Because they kick major ass.)
No I haven’t touched Mercy Falls yet and it was on my to-read list… but after reading your thoughts, I may not even try it. Why waste time on wimpy characters?
I agree that Mercy Falls was dismal, but I also agree that The Scorpio Races is a vast improvement. This entry is going to be a tremendous help in revising my YA Fantasy novel this month. I don’t think I’ve committed any of the sins on your list…
As far as recommendations, I would suggest M.T Anderson’s Feed, Scott Westerfeld’s Uglies series, and Holly Black’s Modern Faerie Tales. Sisters Red and Melissa Marr’s Wicked Lovely stuff is all right, too. I didn’t properly appreciate Uglies until I had read the full trilogy.
Blargh. I totally agree with having a weak female main character being the worst mistake a YA author can make. Not only are they doing their female readers a disservice by insinuating that we need strong male leads to save us from ourselves, it makes for very frustrating reading. Bella is the kind of girl I would want kick in the face if I were Edward or Jacob. How many times can she endanger herself? I mean cliff diving? What the fuck?
Agreed, agreed, AGREED. On all counts. I see girls walking around with the Twilight novels and I just cringe. I want to run up, swap them out with something else, and run off cackling and triumphant, having saved another one.
Actually, Bella cliff diving is Bella acting like a teenager. Haven’t you ever met teenagers who do stupid/ life-endangering things?
Yes, I have. And I have things to say about this, but I really don’t want to turn this into a “Twilight”-bashing post. It’s why I didn’t want to go too much into “Twilight”. So I’m going to stop now.
Definitely avoid Cassandra Clare’s Mortal Instruments series. It’s basically Harry Potter fanfic+Twilight=Dreck.
I started that series. I didn’t continue. I had high hopes – it seemed well-received – but I hated everyone but Simon. And since he was only a tertiary character, I couldn’t continue. Ugh.
First of all…
I LOVE YOU FOR THIS POST.
Secondly, I am in total agreement with you on everything. I DETEST the weak female thing, and cannot tolerate it when authors disrespect teen readers by portraying teen girls as weak, must-have-a-boy-to-save-me, mindless drones. For example (perhaps the ultimate): Bella. (Thank you, Jessica, for backing me on this one!) Has anyone even thought about the fact that, if one were to strip away the whole “vampire therefore tortured and complicated” thing, the Twilight books are basically about an emotionally abusive relationship? Yeah, I love encouraging my teen readers to get involved with the guy who watches you sleep, makes you keep his darkest secrets without having a soul to process with, pulls you close and then drops you without warning or even a conversation on the matter, and who first PUTS you in danger, only to “save” you in the end. Lovely. (PS. Hush Hush’s Patch is this guy, too. How does having wings or sparkly skin make it OK to be abusive?!)
I could rant and rage with you on many, many titles. (Forest of Hands and Teeth, by Carrie Ryan? The gist of it is this: “Oh, I’m sad and lonely and in love with this guy I can’t have. And gee, zombies are trying to kill me and everyone I know. But mostly, I’m just worried about my sort-of-boyfriend/ unhealthy emotional affair. I’m also prone to putting myself in danger because I act thoughtlessly. But mostly…yeah, I want a boyfriend.”)
However, I will answer your question as to good YA Fantasy lit:
Delirium by Lauren Oliver
The River of Time series by Lisa Bergren (This one even has that “saving myself for marriage” thing, but it is handled in a very believable, respectful and not-annoying way.)
Savvy by Ingrid Law (for middle school age, but a delightful, tall-tale read!)
Kingdom of Xia series by Cindy Pon (Chinese fantasy! Love it!)
Ash by Malinda Lo
Gregor the Overlander series by Suzanne Collins is also pretty fun.
Again…thanks for this post! I am a YA blogger with two other women, and we all work in publishing. My fellow bloggers are a lot more forgiving than I am of these irritations in YA Fantasy (and YA in general), so it is wonderful to see someone else out there rages against these things, too! (Our blog is http://www.YAketyYAks.com)
THANK you for mentioning The Forest of Hands and Teeth. The world itself is pretty cool and I had high hopes for it, but I got so irritated with the main protagonist. Girl, you have bigger problems than your obsessive crush, focus!
I agree. In fact, I hate to admit it turned me off to YA zombie fic. Any good recs?? (I loved Pride, Prejudice and Zombies…but I guess it’s not technically YA.
)
I haven’t read Pride & Prejudice in years, so haven’t read Pride, Prejudice & Zombies (I think I need a re-read before I read it, so I catch everything!)
That was actually my first venture into zombie YA, and I’ve been a little leery since, so we’re in the same boat, hah. *love* Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. Now I’m curious enough to remedy this.
I feel like I should have hated it more! I really liked the world, so I think I went lighter on it than I perhaps should have. And I really liked one of the characters in the sequel (not the protagonist, however.)
Thank you! I’m so glad you liked it, and I can’t wait to check out your blog!
I am in complete (as I mentioned on another comment) Twilight agreement. I didn’t hate Forest of Hands and Teeth as much as you did – I was just kind of “meh” on it. I liked the sequel better, I think.
Thank you for the list! I’m writing them all down! I’ve read the Gregor the Overlander series, and just loved it. I can’t wait to introduce my nephew to it when he’s a little older! (He’s still a toddler, so wouldn’t get it yet!)
I had high hopes for Forest because the teens at my library (in my teen specialist days in a public library) LOVED that series. They rarely loved a series that I thought was awful (Twilight aside), so I gave it a shot. And. Hated. Everything. But…maybe I was just a little cranky?
Please, please let me know if you enjoy those titles! (Umm…let me know via…email? a post? magical thought transfers?) I adore talking about them and recommend them all as frequently as possible. Would love your thoughts!
Spot on, i agree with everything and Duckie was totally gay. I kind of wished they’d get together at the end … but still, VERY gay
xx
Hee! Thank you! I know, I totally had a crush on Duckie as a teen – but then I got to college, and realized that I had NO GAYDAR and had crushes on all the gay men. I’ve fixed that since. Whew.
I just want to say I love you and agree with everything you’ve said here. That is all. =)
Aw, thank you! I love to be loved!
I like Libba Bray’s Gemma Doyle trilogy. The third book was a bit weak, but it was overall an entertaining read.
Thank you! I’ll add them to the list! I think I’ve read some of Libba Bray’s work and liked it, so this one’s got a lot of potential!
Can I add: the gruff older mentor who does nothing but spout platitudes so the MC can go from useless to superhero? I’m looking at you, “Eragon” — can’t remember the mentor character’s name. It’s been done to death and to me only Yoda in The Empire Strikes Back, or Gandalf in Hobbit and LOTR comes close — both had personality, flaws, and were occasionally wrong about things. And their young charges didn’t achieve anything worthwhile without suffering horrible loss first. The only good mentor characters are the ones who challenge and scare the bejeezus out of the main character in the story — otherwise their just like an anonymous grade-school teacher you learned nothing from.
Ugh, I HATED Eragon. It was touted as the “it” book and I just hated it so much. I barely remember it now, so deep was my hate. I apparently let it slip out of my mind like a bad dream.
I did, too! But I gave the rest of the series a shot, and ended up really loving Inheritance. (I even wrote Christopher Paolini an apology on our blog. Ha!) I rarely go back to a series if I hated the first book…but I’m glad I did with that one.
I think Dumbledore is a good mentor character as well: seems perfect and all-powerful at first, but gradually revealed to be deeply flawed yet still deserving respect.
Agreed. Completely. I loved how layered Dumbledore turned out to be!
When a skill that actually takes tons of work and practice and boring repetition is magically acquired by the protagonist–Mercedes Lackey, who I LOVE most of the time, is particularly heinous about having her heroines and heros intuitively pick up musical instruments during the narrative equivalent of a quick montage and it makes me bonkers
Hee! Good one! I love Mercedes Lackey, too, and completely agree!
1st: My big pet peeve is the assumption that, because a book is typically found in the Children’s or YA section, it inherently has less literary worth than books found in the Adult or general section. That it’s bound to be less sophisticated than Adult books. I think that attitude is very patronizing to children and teens.
There are trashy adult books as well as trashy YA books. Conversely, there are Juv/YA books that have great style and substance — think of Madeline L’Engle’s works, for instance. Or Sharon Creech. Or Mark Twain. Think of Brian Selznick’s Hugo Cabret and Wonderstruck. I don’t want to feel like I have to apologize to my fellow over-20-year-olds for reading these books.
2nd: As a sub-category to the Been There Done That mistake, my pet peeve is the Chosen Kid trope. This was my biggest problem with China Mieville’s Un Lun Dun. It was so obviously a rip off of Harry Potter — the chosen kid who doesn’t know she’s chosen, otherworld characters who show up in the ordinary world and act all honored to meet the chosen kid, a magical market (*cough*Diagon Alley*cough*), magical buses, a villain whose name nobody wants to say…
The worst aspect of this trope, if it’s not done well, is that it makes you wonder WHY THE HELL THE PEOPLE CAN’T SAVE THEMSELVES?? Why are they sitting around waiting for a 12-year-old who never even knew this otherworld existed until just a day or so ago? I mean, if said 12-year-old was like Katniss Everdeen, who was chosen for her actions and natural talents, not just some vague prophecy, it would make more sense.
Sure, even in Mockingjay, I started to feel like the rebel leaders expected Panem’s citizens to be so weak and motivation-less that they can’t fight for themselves unless they have a symbolic leader to look up to. But then, at least that shows something interesting about Panem’s political/social structure after so many years of oppression. By contrast, the people in Un Lun Dun seem to expect that their prophesied hero will just somehow know what to do when she’s thrown in front of the villain.
My other beef with Un Lun Dun is that the magical elements that weren’t Harry Potter rip-offs were too random. Anyone who knows me knows I love randomness, so when I complain about randomness, it’s srs biz! It’s like the author was thinking, Ok, this is a fantasy, so I need to throw in as many weird/fantasy-ey things as possible so this otherworld really seems different from the ordinary world. It got so eye-rollingly obnoxious that I gave up halfway through the book.
I’m guilty of your first point. Well, I’m not guilty of thinking less of people for reading them, but I’m guilty of feeling GUILTY for reading them, because people just get so damn judgey about it. “You’re reading a YOUNG ADULT BOOK? WHY?” Ugh, shut up, at least I read, philistine co-worker.
Wow, Un Lun Din had that many Harry Potter similarities? That’s to the point of being embarrassing! If you can’t be at least a little creative, why are you even BOTHERING? And Mieville is a big deal! What’s going on there?
I can definitely relate to getting judgmental comments for reading “not challenging enough” books. *eyeroll*
Yeah, when I first started reading Un Lun Dun, and I saw the list of Mieville’s other works, I thought, Oh, hey! Perdido Street Station! The Booksluts wrote about that recently
I don’t know that much about Mieville, but maybe he’s more used to writing books with an adult audience in mind. Maybe when he consciously tried to write a kids’ story, he focused too much on marketability (Kids love Harry Potter, so maybe I should write something like that!) and not enough on just writing a good story.
I don’t believe Mark Twain intended his books to be YA. They just got classified as YA in our time just because the protagonists are children. Perhaps that’s the trick to writing good YA books: write as if for adults (see the ‘not talking down to the reader’ point in the article).
Yes, that’s true. That’s why it can get tricky to try to define “YA” lit vs. other lit. There are Adult books that focus on young characters (The Lovely Bones, The Secret Life of Bees . . .) — is it that the themes are considered more accessible/appropriate for adults than for kids and teens? Is it the length? (I seem to remember reading about an editor who told J. K. Rowling that one of her Potter books was too long to be classified Children’s.)
But then, there are kids (read: 14-year-old me ^^; ) who’ll gladly pick up a 500-page Jean Auel book and get through the big words and looong setting descriptions and anthropological discussions and very blunt descriptions of sex because the story is interesting.
Madeleine L’Engle, author of A Wrinkle in Time and many others, famously said that if what you’re writing is too hard for adults, write it for children. That mentality set her apart as one of the literary giants of “children’s” books. Her stories are ALWAYS full of science, philosophy and mythology…and kids (and teens…and, well, me) love them. One of my all time favorite books is “Ring of Endless Light.” She deals with death and science and magic and marine biology and families and love and sexuality….the list goes on. She was a genius and I am so honored to share her name!
PS. Add every Madeleinie L’Engle title to the list I provided earlier.
Pingback: Bookish News and Publishing Tidbits 8 February 2012 | Read in a Single Sitting - Book reviews and new books
I couldn’t agree more with this post. I really hate those weak female lead. And the love triangles just for the sake of having a love triangle in the story. I don’t know if it’s just me, but I practically get goosebumps when I hear people raving about the Twilight series. I myself have had to read it on the sly, just within the closed doors of my bedroom. I have to read it to satisfy the curious soul in me, I have to know what the hype was all about. With the way everyone was talking about it, I thought it was bigger than the Harry Potter series. Jeez. I can’t stop smirking while reading it. For gosh’s sake, you’d think having a boyfriend is the most important thing in the world. And the way Bella leads Jacob on, is totally disheartening. She makes herself a trouble magnet just so she can upset everyone in her vicinity and for them all to make a fuss at her. The ending was (*SPOILER ALERT*) so corny (Bella turned out to be the most powerful one?) and weird. I mean who is not bothered when Jacob and the daughter ended up to be the one for each other. Blehh. I think they were really catapulted into superstardom just because Rob Pattinson and Taylor Lautner definitely are swoon worthy for the teens (and even some adults) standards.
I also read the entire Twilight series. It was a “know thine enemy” thing, more than anything. How can I snark on something (intelligently, at least) if I’m not knowledgeable about it?
Yes to everything you have said!!! Most importantly that there is only one Buffy and Angel so enough already!
I love strong kick arse female leads (hence why I have always adored the likes of Buffy and Faith, I wish we could see more of them.
Me too! If you haven’t read the “His Dark Materials” trilogy by Philip Pullman, I think you’d love it. Lyra Silvertongue is an excellent female protagonist. Flawed, but strong and brave. I adore her.
Great post. Another pet hate to add: characters that are impossibly perfect (known as Mary-Sues in fanfic, not sure if the same term applies to original fiction), or conversely all bad, without any redeeming qualities.
Now I’ll probably have to dodge a lot of virtual tomatoes for the following comment
, but I don’t think the Twilight series is all bad. I read it out of curiosity, to see what the fuss is all about. I suspect it’s successful to a great extent because it portrays the teenage mindset so well. That said, Bella *isn’t* a good role model. The series would have been better had she been forced to deal with the consequences of her behaviour – being so self-absorbed, neglecting her friends (human) and family, and falling in love purely on the basis of looks, coolness and unattainability – rather than rewarded for it.
No tomatoes. None at all.
And yes. Characters that are all good or all bad are hard to deal with, because no one is like that in real life. I like my characters with all the shades of gray we come with in real life, you know?
A short how-to blog. I love it. I haven’t read that many YA novels, but enough to know what’s good and what’s bad. Like you I love His Dark Materials. I read only the first Harry Potter, which I thought was entertaining, but wasn’t inspired to read any more. I don’t know how to draw comparisons, though, with what reaches the cinema. I didn’t read Twilight, though I managed to suffer the first ten minutes of the film before giving up. Ditto I Am Number Four, which I thought was unwatchable. Thought it’s been several decades since I was a teenager, I can still relate to a good tale, well told, no matter what age the protagonists are. The problem, though, is not just what the less talented writers produce, but what publishers pump out, trying to jump on the various bandwagons out there.
That’s a good point – everything’s the “next” something. The “next” Harry Potter/”Twilight”/”Hunger Games.” I wish we had less of “the next” and more of “look at this, it’s shiny! And new! And unlike anything that’s ever been seen, how innovative!”
I agree with your points.
I do have to say that even Harry Potter has an incredible number of flaws, not least of all the last four books not connecting with the first three (because JKR only came up with a long term plan once the first movie was in production).
However, the first three books are a good example of quality children’s literature.
One good thing about Twilight is that it gives hope to hopeful authors like me. It shows that anything can be published nowadays no matter how terrible it is and many people will still love it.
Hee! Your last statement made me laugh. But please don’t live by it! Instead, give us something PHENOMENAL. I’d like that much more.
First of all, I feel like I’ve been enlightened just a little bit, and when I get to finishing my YA novel, I’ll keep this post bookmarked. While I’ve always been a firm believer in strong independent female characters, you added more noteworthy ideas that really make sense for the genre.
Second, I, too, think you should get out of that mindset that YA is “less” than adult fiction. Don’t feel guilty unless its angsty or stupid (then, well, it’s got its own set of problems). There is nothing wrong with reading Harry or The Hunger Games!!! YA literature has been coming into its own for quite some time, and the root of the problem for the disputers is jealousy and pride. Be on the winning side, here.
Thirdly, I noticed you did not add Veronica Roth’s Divergent. While some book review sources have slammed on the fact that Chicago could never be dystopian and segregated into factions without a question of the rest of the world, what matters is the setting she invents, the characters, and the plot. (Some reviewers have pointed out how Beatrice, the main character, doesn’t really possess her own character. I disagree. She is figuring out who she is, and sometimes that is in relation to the people and circumstances around you. Every teenager goes through this!)
Fourthly, my most hated series has been Paolini’s Inheritance Cycle. I had high hopes for Eragon, but the second book showed me that even I know (I was 16 at the time) a 17 yr old kid cannot write such an involved series without stealing directly from LOTR and droning on and on about unimportant details. The whole “Fast-paced” narrative necessary to YA just died a gruesome death in his works. (Geez, this would be why I lovingly kept my novel on the backburner, so that maybe one day it will be good enough and not crappy or stolen from anything I’ve read before. *mimics Mad-Eye* CONSTANT ORIGINALITY! Or you know, at least enough different for people to love your writing for your ideas and your weaving of the story, and not simply because of the subject matter.)
Also, I have to add my two cents on Twilight, but you’re welcome to tune me out if you’ve decided you’re gonna blast me already.
While Bella is a rather safe and timid main character, her main issue (as discovered in New Moon) is that she has a serious penchant for DEPRESSION. Her responses to school, moving, parental divorce, and romance all emphasize how either she has SAD or just simply depression itself. Most teenagers do not realize the Bella’s actions as symptoms of depression, but it’s happened to me, and I’ve always thought of myself as a strong, independent female. That quality is pretty much eradicated in the fact of depression, even when it is caused by pharmacological reasons. So, in my opinion, I think we can forgive Bella some because of this serious issue that teens do go through, despite how little we want to admit it…
I’m glad you liked the post, thank you!
I liked “Divergent.” It wasn’t ground-breaking, but I thought it was solid, and I’m curious to continue on with the series. I liked Four. I found his character interesting, and not ordinary for YA.
I will not blast anyone for “Twilight.” No more “Twilight” comments from me. “Twilight” seems to be like discussing politics, and I try to avoid doing that as much as possible, too. I’m a Libra. We like balance and pretty things and avoid conflict whenever possible.
Females tend to come across badly in lots of genres, not just teenage fiction. They always seem to be clever and/or beautiful and of course they’re always waiting for a man to sweep them away. There are few book I know of that contain ‘normal’ women.
In his critique of the fantasy genre,Michael Moorcock dealth with this issue admirably in his Wizardry & Wild Romance book.
And as for Twilight, where is peter Cushing when you need him!!
Agreed. (I feel like I’m all “agreed agreed AGREED” today but you’re all wonderful and brilliant and I love you.) I tend to fall more in love with the flawed characters that are more “human” than stock characters who fit the “perfect/beautiful/yet waiting for the ONE GRAND LOVE” mold, you know? I want to meet my best friend in a book, not someone I wouldn’t want to hang out with in real life.
Robert Heinlein once remarked that he wrote young adult fiction by writing an adult novel, then taking out the sex.
Serious? That’s terrible. Maybe young adults should just read adult fiction. God knows tons of them of having sex.
OMG woman, get out of my head!
I’ve been on a YA dystopian kick of late, and after a while the books just got so. damn. formulaic. that I wrote this:
http://beinghave.blogspot.com/2011/12/how-to-write-ya-dystopian-novel.html
I love this post. I love this blog. You booksluts are awesome.
Pingback: Work is what you do for others, liebchen. Art is what you do for yourself. « Lucy's Football
Pingback: Reading Rage Tuesday: Types of characters I never want to read in a book again. | Insatiable Booksluts
Just discovered your blog and wanted to say it’s awesome and so much fun to read! I usually shy away from YA books because I haven’t found that many which I’ve enjoyed. Some of the reasons for that you’ve already listed above. I think my biggest pet peeve is that the plots just don’t make sense to me because I’m not a young reader (I’m in my 20s) and I don’t see the world that way anymore, so I can’t appreciate those books. For example, I started Hunger Games but the fact that all the adults seemed so inept and it was up to the teens to rescue them and save the day just seemed implausible and I couldn’t get invested in the story. What am I missing? I’m browsing the comments looking for some better YA titles but haven’t found anything I love yet.
Hee! I love your name. “Book Nympho.” You should fit right in