SURPRISE! Moving giveaway! Win a t-shirt!

So, this is our last night here at WordPress.com. We’ve really loved being here and I wish we could stay–but the longer we stay here, the harder it will be to move to our own site later, and I have super secret future plans that will, eventually, require that we have our own site. You can find us now at InsatiableBooksluts.com.

We started posting this about a week ago, and about 2% of our subscribers have subscribed at the new blog so far. (We’ve also been getting an  uptick in new subscribers here. I love new subscribers! But if you guys stay here and don’t visit our new blog, you will miss all the new posts! Also, I will miss you.) I know it’s kind of asking a lot to shift everyone over to a new venue–in fact, it’s a pain in the ass for everyone, and I know, and I’m so sorry. So I thought, how can I make this more exciting for everyone? I checked my Skreened account earlier when I was making some new designs (see above), and lo! I have credit! And Skreened credit means I can do a t-shirt giveaway! Upon further inspection, I found that I also have a small amount of Zazzle credit, so I’ll throw a few Zazzle items in for good measure!

We’re hosting the giveaway itself on our new site, because you’re going to have to go there anyway, right? The giveaway will be open until March 18, so head on over early and maximize your chances to win a free shirt!

The Future of Publishing? Know Your Publisher, vol. VI: Red Lemonade

Before I dig in to this post, I must leave (yet another) a reminder that IB is moving to a new site starting March 5. We will no longer be posting here at our WordPress.com blog. If you want to stay subscribed and keep receiving content from our blog, please hop over to the new site (which is already up!) and subscribe in the sidebar or update your RSS feeds! Thank you!

Publisher: Red Lemonade

Location: Brooklyn, NY

Founded: 2011 by Richard Nash of Soft Skull Press

Distributor: Publishers Group West

Notable Authors/Works: Zazen by Vanessa Veselka; Lynne Tillman; Follow Me Down by Kio Stark

Open Submissions: Absolutely, sort of. More about this when you read on.

Kindle/e-reader available: Yes

Publishes Periodicals/Quarterlies: No

General Information: Today’s Know Your Publisher edition includes an interview. This is the first interview I have conducted for IB, and I don’t think I could have picked a better first interview topic than Red Lemonade, a press that some have called the future of publishing.

Red Lemonade is the product of Cursor, which is the brainchild of Richard Nash. Cursor provides a platform that approaches publishing in a new way–what has come to be known as crowdsourcing, a user-driven application where large groups of people are called to participate in achieving an end result. Red Lemonade does not just have a website where you go and buy the books they have to offer; the website hosts a writing community, where writers and readers alike participate in creation. A writer uploads a work, and other community members comment on the work, offering praise and criticism both; the works that get the most positive buzz over time have the best potential to be tapped for publication. The idea behind Cursor seems to be to create different presses with differently-themed communities, all powered by one platform; Red Lemonade leans toward “edgier, adult literary fiction”, but another Cursor-powered press may deal with science fiction, or even more specific topics.

I interviewed Brian McFarland, the community manager at Red Lemonade.

Susie: Some people perceive writers as being a bit . . . sensitive . . . about their work. How has the experience been with exchanging feedback between readers and writers?

Brian: It is an ongoing point of discussion, a fascinating type of writing workshop, a new way to experience literature and a bit of a conundrum (in a riddle, in an enigma) all in one. Feedback and suggestions are often perceptive and the writer can respond, make changes, or explanations.  Works that get more comments ‘bubble up’, so to speak, and it’s great that there is a focused community that is part of the review process.  On the Red Lemonade site, you can select a specific line or word, highlight it and then comment on specific parts of the text, which is really cool and interesting to follow.

Susie: I noticed when I went to look at Zazen that the online copy had a ton of annotations. I think I could have spent the whole day reading them if I’d had time.

Brian: Indeed. The work we are publishing in April, Matthew Battles’ Sovereignties of Invention, generated many responses as well.

Susie: Do the books remain available to read online after they’re tapped for publication?

Brian: Yes, you can read both books online for free at this very moment. And yet, people are tweeting, commenting, adding to reading list the Zazen physical book.

Susie: There’s an ebook controversy raging right now (what’s new, right?). What are your thoughts on ebooks?

Brian: There is so much focus on the means of delivery, and not enough on what is being delivered–the rough and tumble heartfelt and intellectual surprises that readers experience and writers love to create. That feeling you get when you talk to your best friend about your favorite authors, or someone suggests a new book to you, or you find a good author who loves another author and you follow that reading trail to worlds and words you never knew of before.

Susie: Does most of the editing happen organically through the community, or is there a separate, more thorough process that the work undergoes once you decide to publish it?

Brian: It’s a workshop not solely designed to be just a part of the selection process; it’s opening up the whole culture of the book. It’s Penn and Teller creating a plexiglass Chinese Box; the magic is still there but everyone is part of it, no need to climb the skyscrapers, so to speak. But yes, an editorial sense, vision, awareness of context and history with a certain approach to writing, that is part of the whole shebang, too. Readers contribute, writers talk to writers, the interns lend a hand, the editor has their say. The Hybrid Beasts submissions are this process going on right now and it’s exciting to see.

Molly Gaudry of the LitPub is our editor [for Hybrid Beasts]; it is her vision which helps define what works we are looking for and will contribute to the final selections and styles of the works.

Red Lemonade has a keen appreciation of language, words, the act of translations, other languages, dolphin speak. The whole culture of the word. Another aspect, and Zazen really touches on this, is a strong cultural awareness, battle reports from the field received long before they are received by sailing ship.

Susie: I don’t want to take up all of your time today ^_^ but I’d like to get any other  information that you wanted to share before I go. Any events coming up?

Brian: Richard Melo–whose novel Happy Talk will be published this summer–is going to hold an online class [tentatively in early summer], working as a writing facilitator/coach about approaches to writing a novel. The class will be five sessions of exploring writing approaches and methodologies. Another aspect of publishing that we see as part of our community.

//

Thank to Brian for having a chat with me about Red Lemonade. If you’re curious to find out more about what the crowdsourcing method of publishing looks like, pop on over to their website and sign up for a free account. Their library contains complete published and unpublished manuscripts to read for free; you can not only read the works, but join in on the conversation about them, highlighting and commenting on your favorite passages and talking to others who liked the same parts you like. (If you’re a writer, know that the site is still in Beta, and you must contact the publisher to be allowed to upload a work of your own.) Who knows? You could help publish a book!

You can also find out more about Richard Nash and Red Lemonade at The Next Best Book Blog.

What do you guys think? Is this the future of publishing? Are you guys interested in being part of the process, or would you rather stick to works that have already been through someone else’s wringer? Have you had personal experience using Red Lemonade? Let us know in the comments!

Reading Rage Tuesday: Ebooktroversy!

Before I dig in to this week’s Reading Rage, I must leave a reminder that IB is moving to a new site starting March 5. We will no longer be posting here at our WordPress.com blog. If you want to stay subscribed and keep receiving content from our blog, please hop over to the new site (which is already up!) and subscribe in the sidebar or update your RSS feeds! Thank you!

Kindle

Today’s reading rage covers a topic that annoys not only me, but just about everyone in the book industry. Even before the recent scuffle between Amazon and IPG (Independent Publishers Group), the price of ebooks has been a hotly contested issue among publishers, authors, retailers, and readers. Dramatized, it might go something like this:

Publishers: Do you have any idea how much money we don’t make? Our profit margins are so narrow they would make a supermodel feel fat.

Authors: Do you know how much time I spent writing that book, and you want to sell it for ninety-nine cents? Are you mad? I poured my soul and life into this work. Also, I’m pretty broke because I’m a starving artist and whatnot, and I’d like to get paid, please.

Retailers: Um, hey, you guys, I’m really sorry that you haven’t figured out how to make money yet, but we’re kind of doing really well making money and we think you should sell ebooks cheaper so you can sell more of them. Also, we’re kind of selling these e-readers that people need to read your books at a loss so people will buy more of them, and thus, more of these ebooks. Just sayin’.

Readers: You guys know the library still has free books, right? And what have you done for me lately? [Great article over at Dear Author that I highly suggest you read, if you haven't already.]

IPG has posted a statement on their website that explains the costs of ebook production relative to the cost of trade paperbacks. It all looks really good for them and bad for Amazon, of course. There is, as always, more to the story, though.

Amazon used to buy ebooks and sell them far cheaper than cost, which made the publishers a bit miffed. Steve Jobs, who wanted to get in on the ebook trade with Apple’s iBooks, said that Amazon  had “screwed up” its business model by selling books so cheaply. What he, of course, really meant was that Amazon had screwed things up for its competitors: Amazon sells a little bit of everything, and using the Kindle and ebooks as loss leaders, they bring customers to their site more frequently to buy more books and more everything else that Amazon sells. Amazon also has always known that people don’t want to pay as much for ebooks as they do for treebooks. Treebooks have more intrinsic value, since you can sell them (or buy them used), or repurpose or recycle the materials, or even donate them to a library; since treebooks are tangible, they also have a greater perceived value to many readers. In order to make iBooks more competitive, Steve Jobs gave Amazon the run-around and destroyed their business model, at least insofar as the major publishers go (perhaps this is why we’re seeing Amazon dipping into the publishing realm, too?):

Jobs solution was ruthless and brilliant. He told the publishers that Apple would “go to the agency model, where you set the price, and we get our 30%, and yes, the customer pays a little more, but that’s what you want anyway.”

This made the publishers happy, but it didn’t solve the problem of Amazon undercutting the iBooks store on price.

To solve this, Jobs negotiated an agreement from the publishers to allow Apple to sell the books at a lower price if any other vendor began selling them in ebook form cheaper than Apple was.

This effectively turned the publishers into Apple’s crow bar, gaining them leverage against Amazon. As Jobs explains it, “they went to Amazon and said, “You’re going to sign an agency contract or we’re not going to give you the books.” — from an article on The Next Web

In a post on their site, IPG talks about their inability to force Amazon to stick to the agency model:

Only the six biggest publishing companies have had the market power to compel Amazon to accept the Agency Model, which allows the publisher to keep 70% of the e-book list price. Independent publishers have had to accept the Wholesale Model, which has let us keep only about 50% of the suggested price. That is a 20% difference. — IPG website

First, off, thanks for the math lesson, Einstein. I never could have figured out that 70-50=20.

Secondly, I find this a little fishy, for several reasons.

When you produce a product out in the real world, and you sell it to huge distributors like Amazon, based on what I know from various business classes, it doesn’t seem like you really get to keep a full 70% of the retail price of your product. You make up for this by selling in bulk; bulk sales are the reason that resellers get access to this discount price and Joe-off-the-street doesn’t. The reason for this seems to be that if someone is willing to buy a crapload of your product off of you all at once, it’s generally smart to sell it to them, even if you make less money per unit, because you gots to get paid–especially since the longer it takes you to make back the money you sank into the product, the longer you’re not in the black. Time is money, friend.*

(*For 10 points, tell me where you’ve heard this line before.)

So, I’m a little suspicious of IPG whining about selling their books wholesale. Uh, welcome to the rest of the business world?

The wholesale model makes a hell of a lot of sense for publishers, because, barring opening up their own retail outlets, which cost a lot to staff and operate, they need someone to sell the books. And those someones need to be able to make enough money off of the books to justify even carrying them. Literature may be an art, but book-slingin’ is a business.

Enter Amazon. Everyone shops at friggin’ Amazon. Even people who think Amazon is the Great Satan still secretly shop there. Amazon has a lot of purchasing power, because it has a lot of money. It has a lot of money because everyone shops there. If you sell something, the place where everyone shops is kind of the place that you want to be. Amazon also has a lot of money because it is smart at selling things. So, I dunno, if I were a company that seemed to be having trouble meeting the bills because of slim profit margins, I might sit up and take notice when Amazon said my ebooks were overpriced.

Being “forced” into a standard wholesale contract like the rest of the business world could actually be good for IPG, for a few reasons:

  • Amazon will probably buy more books if offered a better contract. What publishers lose in percentage, I bet they will make up and then some in volume. And since these are ebooks, they don’t have to pay to have them reprinted–they can keep selling them indefinitely off of the master files, which means the cost per copy sold decreases over time and the profit margin increases.
  • Indie presses don’t generally (with a few exceptions) have a lot of highly-anticipated blockbusters like Harry Potter or The Hunger Games. The reason that Amazon lets the publishers who do have these books get away with charging more is that they know they have instant mega-sales when these books release–some people will buy both an e-book copy and a hardback so they don’t have to wait even a second to start reading. Those publishers don’t just publish the big-name books, though; by selling indie ebooks at a lower price point, indie books become more attractive than these publishers’ less blockbuster-y works. That means more sales. Volume, again, makes up for loss in percentage.
  • Indie authors are usually authors that many readers haven’t encountered before. A lower price point may convince more new readers to take a chance on unfamiliar authors, thus creating more fans of indie authors and presses.
  • More sales means more buzz about indie authors, which means even more sales. Not just for this book, but also for future books by the same author.
  • Book reviewers (cough) such as myself will be able to afford to buy more indie books to review, which means more exposure, which means more sales! (P.S. Indie presses and authors, I totally accept ebooks to review. Just saying. Pitch us.)

Kindle 3

I really think a huge part of this problem is that publishers are a little bit behind when it comes to making ebooks work for them. Publishers seem to see ebooks as having a 1:1 replacement ratio for treebooks–as in, for every ebook they sell, they fail to sell a treebook. When ebooks are priced at $10, they’re probably right about that; lowering the price on ebooks, however, has some interesting implications. What would happen, for example, if you were selling an ebook at $5.99, and instead of sacrificing one treebook to sell one ebook, you sold two or three or four ebooks to each treebook that wasn’t sold? Or if instead of buying a used copy for four or five dollars (keeping in mind that you automatically plunk down four dollars in shipping if you’re shopping used at Amazon, so even the penny used books cost at least four bucks), a person picked up a new ebook because it’s more convenient and only costs a bit more? A person might spend five or six dollars on an ebook rather than wait for the library, but likely would skip over the $10 book in favor of the wait. A person might buy two or three ebooks at a time when the price point is less expensive. There are many instances when a less expensive ebook could turn a higher profit through volume.

I hate to blaspheme the great Steve Jobs, but this is all a little annoying. Apple has always sold high-priced goods, and has profited by being insular and just a tiny bit incestuous–you get the iPod, which works with iTunes, which has an iStore where you buy iMusic or whatever. The thing about the iPad as an e-reader, though, is that you can put a Kindle app on it and get the books cheaper on Amazon (or, at least, you could have done that). So, there was really never any reason to go buy higher-priced books through Appleunless you wanted a non-Kindle format (which, for some, is reason enough to shop iBooks, I guess). By forcing the pricing issue and putting high-percentage dollar signs in front of publishers, Steve Jobs has basically ensured that we will always pay through the nose for ebooks. Thanks, Steve.

Publishers, if you’re listening out there, here are a few ideas that could make you more profitable when it comes to ebooks:

  • Sell them cheaper. We will buy more of them if they are cheaper. I swear to God, we will buy more of them. Consuming is what we do.
  • Rent ebooks to us. We can get them from the library, sure, but did you know that there’s often a wait to check out digital library books because there are limited copies? (Of course you knew that, because that’s part of your contract with libraries.) Capitalize on our impatience and let us rent an ebook for a month for a $1.99 or so. The genius of renting the book is that we don’t get to keep it. That means if we want to add it to our collection–as many readers are wont to do when they read a book they love–we have to give you more money. And you will get rental sales from people who wouldn’t have bought the book at any price.
  • Stop freaking out over DRM. People want to buy books. We do. Making the books more user-friendly for us will bump up the perceived value of the books, so we might be willing to pay more. We’re not thieves, we’re your customers.
  • Netflix for ebooks. Think about it.
  • Run more promotions on your own sites and get the word out. We’ll flock to wherever the books are cheap, and us buying directly from you means that you keep more of the money.

So, what do you think of this whole ebook situation, book fans? Am I being too hard on publishers? Am I evil for sort-of defending Amazon? How much do you think ebooks should cost? Tell me all about it in the comments!

Want to stay subscribed to IB? Please read!

So, I made a mistake.

When I first started writing this blog, I thought, oh, I should probably make this blog self-hosted. Then I thought, eh, money is tight and it’ll be a long time before we can build up a readership, so I’ll just start writing now and work on self-hosting as I go.

Well, things happened more quickly than I thought, thanks to our Banned Books Week post being featured on Freshly Pressed. As we started getting more subscribers, I thought, well, it’ll slow down once the Freshly Pressed stuff dies down. I was, again, wrong; I completely underestimated the awesomeness of people out there who wanted to participate in our bookslutty community. Around Thanksgiving, I knew I was going to have to switch over at some point to a self-hosted blog, as we were having a lot of cool ideas that we couldn’t implement well due to the limitations of being hosted on WordPress.com.

I waffled. I waffled so hard that Eggo called me and asked for my recipe.

I finally decided to bite the bullet today and switch the blog over. After this week, we won’t be posting here at WordPress.com anymore; starting March 5, we will be exclusively posting at our very own blog, InsatiableBooksluts.com. (Until then, we will continue to post only here, so people don’t get double notifications.) There’s a link on the new blog’s sidebar where our old subscription link used to be; if you’d like to stay subscribed–and I truly hope that you do want to stay subscribed–please pop on over and subscribe to us, or update your rss feed to http://insatiablebooksluts.com/feed . As always, we can also be found on Twitter and on Facebook.

I’m sorry for any inconvenience this may cause you. Please feel free to give me 40 lashings with the thickest book you have at hand. After you go subscribe to the new IB, that is.

Hey, you should read this: Using Twitter to market the books you wrote.

I got a tweet yesterday on my private account–not that it’s protected or anything, but I just mean, on my non-book account–from an author imploring me to check out his work online. I had never encountered this author before, and I really had no bloody idea why on earth I should want to check out his “fiction” in a magazine–no, I mean really, I had no idea why he had approached me or what about me made him think I might connect to his work. A quick glance at his Twitter told me that he didn’t really know why I would like it, either–most of his tweets had the same indiscriminate message blasted at a number of targets: Check out my work “X” at website Y!

Being the sweet, caring, and politic person that I am, I told him he was doing it wrong.

To my surprise, he answered back. “Please enlighten, I am too new to Twitter.” How to encapsulate it in 140 characters? I promised him I’d write a blog about it, so here I am, writing a blog about it. He’s not the only person who can benefit from this information, really–I get and see a lot of ill-advised tweeting from people who think it will help boost their sales, but don’t understand that Twitter is not an advertising forum.

If you’re an author who has heard that social media is the way to get readers, but you don’t know how to do it or it hasn’t been working for you, fear not–I’m here to help. This post is specifically about Twitter, but the basic concepts can be used for any social media.

Problem: You post lots of information about your writing, but not very many people are following you or visiting the links that you post up.

Would you watch a television channel that was all commercials, or peruse a website that was all ads? Unless the channel or site was dedicated to exceptional examples of advertising, I’m guessing that you would not. Building your Twitter account with the primary aim of using it to directly market your books–such as by Tweeting random people “Hey you should read my book” or only posting about events related to selling your book–means that you’re basically creating a “channel” that is wall-to-wall advertising. The people that you do manage to get to follow you will probably mentally block your feed within a week.

Solution: Spend the majority of your time on social media building genuine relationships and putting out desirable content.

Social media is called that for a reason–be social! Talk to people. Make friends, remembering that the person who goes on incessantly about their own projects comes off being a tiny bit self-absorbed. Instead, ask people about their projects. Form collaborations, or guest post on blogs. Put yourself out there, and be generous and genuine. Or, barring that, be wickedly funny. People on the internet love the lulz. You get followers because there’s something in it for them to follow you.

Not talking about your projects may seem counter-intuitive, but remember what I said about the all-advertising channel. People will turn it off. You can talk a little bit about your projects, but know when ease back. Good things to post are (brief) information regarding events, upcoming publications or appearances–”news,” in other words, especially items that would be helpful to other people. I personally find you can get away with repeating “news” once or twice if you space it out, but too much repetition causes that mental off-switch that you want to avoid. (People on Twitter can be a little tetchy, too. The etiquette rules are quite complex and can be difficult to grasp before you have been there for some time. Playing it safe is better at first.)

Problem: You put out awesome content, and you have a decent amount of followers, but people are still not reading your books.

So, you’ve done step one–you have developed into an awesome tweeter, people are willingly following you–you might even have more followers than you are following at this point, and it’s kind of a big deal when you cross that threshold for the first time. But your sales are still pretty abysmal. What gives?

Solutions: Various potential solutions.

One problem is that you might not be connecting with the right audience. People on Twitter tend to run in circles a lot of the time; I myself have two different accounts, and my follower bases couldn’t be more different, save a few core people that follow both. A very few. My @thebooksluts account has–you guessed it–a lot of readers, writers, and a few publishers that I interact with regularly. My personal account has far more political followers, along with people who are local to where I live, and some people who cook, because I connect with people very differently on that account than I do on my booksluts Twitter. If you write crime thrillers but, because you play video games, have a lot of RPG aficionados as Twitter friends, they’re probably less likely to read your books. Not that you should dump your gamer friends, but consider widening your audience to connect with bookish types who like crime thrillers.

If you have acquired a few trusted confidants, try DMing them and asking if there’s something you’re doing wrong or that you could be doing better. Don’t come off needy or whiny, just that you’re looking for tips to improve communication without being spammy. I find that doing this privately is the best route, as any other conversations are very public, even if they don’t “feel” public. Your friends might be able to give you some great insight.

Make sure, too, that all of your social media is working together. If you’re linking people from Twitter to, say, a blog, and the blog is turning people off for some reason, or your website or what have you, it might not be because of your tweets at all.

Problem: I found someone on Twitter who has a book blog or a website and I want them to feature my book, but after I tweeted them a link, they basically told me to piss off or they ignored me. What did I do wrong?

Starting a conversation with a link to your work is like asking someone out on a date while showing them your genitals. A little romance first would be nice! And really, if you’re trying to (ahem) expose yourself to people who will read your book, this is the way to go, rather than approaching random people on social media. Why? Because book bloggers and websites that feature reviews have fans who want book recommendations. You want people to read your book, and the blog audience wants suggestions on awesome new books to read, so it’s really a match made in heaven if you can get the reviewer on board.

Solution: Romance us, dammit!

First, read the blog or website that you want to be on, or think that you want to be on. You might find out that you actually do not want to be on the site–maybe you write books that the reviewer doesn’t tend to enjoy and he or she would give you a bad review, or maybe the blog audience isn’t your audience.

See if there is a protocol for pitching a book to the person for a review or a feature. Many book bloggers have this on their site. If they have this, then you just follow the protocol. Following the protocol scores MAJOR POINTS because a lot of people? do not follow protocols. A lot of people do not bother to read things that have been posted up, or seem to think that those posts do not apply to them, or something. It makes us predisposed to warm fuzzy feelings when instructions are followed.

If there’s nothing like that on their website, and you have ascertained that your book goes with their audience and their tastes, start by saying something like this: “Hey! I was reading your site and I loved it. I especially liked review of X. I wrote a book that is quite similar to X, do you accept books to review?” Approaching the person like a human being and letting them know that you actually have read their blog will get you in quicker than indiscriminate tweeting; asking if they accept books rather than “will you accept my book” is smart, too, because it’s less pressure for them. If I feel like I’m being pressured, I almost always say no.

Tip: Don’t try to be tricky and sneak your book into conversations that are not about your book. Seriously. Even if you try to make it seem funny, it’s not funny because we know what you’re doing, and it makes us feel like pieces of meat that you look at with dollar signs in your eyes. “Got a vacation coming up, huh? Does that mean you’ll finally have time to read my book?! Eh?! I’m just kidding, we kid, oh this is so funny–but no, seriously, are you ever going to read my book?” Yeah. Don’t do this.

Remember, above all: social media =/= social marketing.

Nobody goes to social media because they desire marketing. Even super famous people with a zillion followers don’t spend all their time sitting around saying “buy my book/watch my show/etc!” They wouldn’t have a zillion followers if they did that. The point of Twitter, if you’re using it to connect with your current or potential future fanbase, is that just being on Twitter and doing a good job at Twitter reminds them that you are there. It’s exposure. And sure, when your newest book gets published, you’ll want to tweet about it–”So happy! My new book finally hit the presses today!”–but the way you would share it with friends, not consumer sheep.

How ’bout you guys? What turns you off when it comes to Twitter marketing? Have you found any tactics to be successful? Tell us in the comments!